Inquiries designed to provide differentiation must be designed to offer support for those learners at risk while challenging those who
require extended learning opportunities. Through a differentiated inquiry, the teacher can explore similar contexts with all learners,
but challenge students to achieve different levels of outcome depending on the students' individual abilities. Differentiating research
tasks can be as simple as setting different questions of different complexities for different groups- colour coding works well here- or
using three level guides. A single research task of graded complexity (perhaps using Bloom et al) could be begun and ended at
different stages by different groups who then report back to the whole class or to jigsaw groups.
When designing differentiated inquiry, it is useful to consider the aims outlined by Tomlinson (1999): Begin by considering student
differences; Focus on multiple intelligences and learning styles; Vary teaching strategies and learning environments; Focus on essential
skills and the making of meaning of key concepts and principles; Aim to develop self-reliant learners; and Develop a collaborative approach
to problem solving. Such an approach is consistent with the call by the Australian Secondary Principal’s Association for curriculum in
the middle years to “emphasise the successful acquisition of broad general knowledge, skills and attitudes, in an iterative process
which is relevant, accessible and flexible in its pedagogy. Students should not be encouraged to overspecialize but rather engage in a
wide range of texts, materials, technologies and learning experiences” (1994?) As part of the Maleny investigation, students visited
the proposed site and surrounding areas as part of a field trip, surveyed residents, and listening to a guest speaker from the development
company as part of their investigation. An inquiry approach encourages multiple literacies and critical evaluation of multiple source of
If learners are to become reflective and self directed learners, they need to have continual opportunities to goal set, to critically
evaluate their investigation methodology and to work collaboratively to offer meaningful advice to peers. Students exposed to a range of
thinking strategies and who are aware of their own thinking processes will participate in more effective learning. Teachers need to make the
learning processes in which students engage explicit to students, and to encourage students to reflect on the thinking process in which they
are engaged. Such metacognition (and metalanguage to discuss the process) empowers students to more ably self-evaluate their progress and
goal set for future learnings. An inquiry approach provides an ideal opportunity to guide students through critical evaluation of
their own journeys as learners and help develop in learners the skills they require to refocus their inquiry processes, and to better
synthesise their findings.
Because students do not learn skills and concepts in the same way, the strategies that may be used to help develop a concept, may not be
sufficiently explicit to develop the skills a student requires to undertake an inquiry investigation. Inquiry skills need to be taught explicitly (Waring,
2001:4). Strategies such as modeling and scaffold guides, and collaborative involvement in joint constructions, are very effective in
helping students identify and develop the skills required to investigate a question in a meaningful way. It is important that the teacher
has a realistic understanding of the sub-skills involved in a particular inquiry investigation, and that appropriate plans are developed to
determine the order and rate at which these sub-skills need to be taught, as well as the most appropriate strategy through which they will
be taught (Kiddey, 2001:3). This can be very problematic for teachers unfamiliar with changes in curriculum direction, such as the inquiry
approach. This issue was highlighted by student feedback to teachers following the one unit, with one student tactfully identifying
the problem in her suggestion for ways we could improve the unit: “Make very sure all teachers know how to teach each part and that
all of us are at the same stage, because students in other classes were behind what we were doing or didn’t learn how to do some
things, so we had to show them in the boarding house.” An essential component of successful change process in teaching and
learning must be the re-skilling of teachers, and a willingness by teachers to engage in such professional renewal.
This shift in emphasis from a pedagogical approach which is “characterised by the teacher’s role as leader and facilitator,
active inquiry by students, and an emphasis on understanding the reasons for social phenomena” (Kemmis, Cole and Suggett, 1983), to
the critical approach which is the philosophical basis of the QSCC SOSE Syllabus is problematic for many teachers. For many teachers,
such a reshaping represents quite a dramatic re-evaluation of current practice. Unless this systematic evaluation and exploration is part
of a consistent, full school culture, it will place considerable stress on teachers who already feel under threat as a profession. It is
particularly challenging for teachers who were educated in the 60s, 70s or even 80s (currently a significant percentage of the teaching
population in this country) in that, if they are to come to terms with the needs of learners in the Twenty-first century, they must teach in
ways quite alien from the ways in which they themselves were taught (Hargraves, 1994: 99) and which may well have formed the foundation of
their philosophy of curriculum. This is particularly true of a shift towards an inquiry approach to learning.
In particular, a move to an inquiry approach poses most problems for teachers whose pedagogical style more closely aligns with a Vocational
neo-classical or ‘conservative’ (Hoepper & Land, 1996: pg85): a style characterized by the undisputed authority of the
teacher, the relative passivity of the students, and the unproblematic transmission of authorised knowledge.” (Kemmis, Cole and
Suggett, 1983). Very few teachers may have been exposed to relevant, productive in-service in how to implement an inquiry approach to
learning in the classroom, and many graduates lack the experience to create the necessary praxis between the theory learned at university
and the practical challenges which face them in the school environment. As Pinar points out, "For many teachers, current school reform
might feel like being yanked around yet one time more." (1992: 229). However, it is only through risk taking in the
classroom and individual critical reflection upon the successes and failures resulting from changed practice, and collaborative sharing of
these reflections that transformation of teaching practice is possible.
A school culture which prioritises and provides adequate time for such reflection is necessary, as is the development of reflective skills of teachers. The 1990 School's Council report, “Australia's Teachers: An Agenda for the Next Decade”, claims that "the approach to teacher education to date has been too narrow and restrictive, and in a number of cases, not closely enough related to reflective thinking about the practice of teaching" (Bransgrove, et.al., 1992: 2) In order to deal with these difficulties, it is necessary for "teachers to be active participants in ... creating new knowledge about teaching and learning" (Sergiovanni & Starratt, 1993: 116).
Aditomo, A, Goodyear, P, Bliuc, AM & Ellis, R (2013), ‘Inquiry-based learning in higher education: Principal forms, educational objectives, and disciplinary variations’, Studies in Higher Education, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1239–1258, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.616584
Abbott-Chapman, Joan & Hughes, Phillip, (October 1991) “What Makes a good Teacher?” Paper Presented to the 21st ATEA National Conference, Melbourne.
Australian Curriculum Studies Association (2003) “Middle Schooling Principals”
http://www.acsa.edu.au/projects/middle/index.hm accessed February 24 2005)
Australian Secondary Principals’ Association (1994?) “Middle School Policy” http://www.aspa.asn.au/polmdsch.htm#top accessed November 22, 2003
Barrat, R (1998) Shaping Middle Schooling in Australia: Report of the National Middle Schooling Project ACSA: Canberra
Beane, J (October 1991) “The Middle School: The Natural Home of Integrated Curriculum” Educational Leadership 49 (2)
Braggett, Eddie (1997) The Middle Years of Schooling Kawker Brownlow: Cheltenham, Vict
Bigelow, B, Harvey, B, Karp, S & Millar L (2002) Rethinking our Classrooms: Teaching for Equity and Justice Rethinking Schools: Milwaukee, WI
Catholic Education Office (2004) “Pathways for Middle Schooling: Walking the Talk” http://www.bne.catholic.edu.au/pub/reandcurriculum/middle_schooling/middleschoolingpositionpaper.pdf accessed April 5th, 2005
Caine, R., and G. Caine. (1994). Making Connections: Teaching and the Human Brain. Menlo Park, Calif.: Addison-Wesley.
Cassie, Fiona (2004) “On Task or Off the Planet?” Education Review April 14-20
Cerezo, Nancy (2004) “Problem-Based Learning In The Middle School: A Research Case Study Of The Perceptions Of At-Risk Females” National Middle Schools Association at http://www.nmsa.org/ accessed April 5 2005)
Cumming, J (ed) (1998) Extending Reform in the Middle Years of Schooling ACSC: Canberra
Education Queensland (2000) “Queensland State Education 2010” http://education.qld.gov.au/corporate/qse2010/ Queensland Government: Brisbane accessed March 11, 2005
Education Queensland (2004) Middle Phases of Learning State School Action Plan
Erikson, H L (1995) Stirring the Head, Heart and Soul: Redefining Curriculum and Instruction Corwin Press: Thousand Oaks, CA
Gordon, K (1999) Inquiry Approaches in Primary Studies of SOSE KLA http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/yrs1to10/kla/sose/docs/rp_pri00.doc Queensland School Curriculum Council: Brisbane accessed June 22, 2005
Hardingham, R (2000) “Reform in the Middle Year” Middle Schooling: An Information Paper prepared for Education Queensland Queensland University of Technology: Brisbane
Hargreaves, A (1994) Changing Teachers, Changing Times: Teachers’ Work and Culture in the Postmodern Age Cassell: London
Hoepper, B and Land, R (1996) ‘Planning investigations” in R. Gilbert (Ed.), Studying Society and Environment: A Handbook for Teachers. Macmillan: Melbourne,
Holden, Steve (2004) “Making Schools Better” Professional Educator 3 (4) October
Kamener, Larry (2005) “Creating and Sustaining a performance and Development Culture” EQ Australia Curriculum Corporation: Carlton, Victoria.
Kemmis, S, Cole, P and Suggett, D (1983) Orientations to Curriculum and Transition to the Socially Critical School, Victorian Institute of Secondary Education: Melbourne.
McIntyre, Donal (1991) “The Oxford University Model of Teacher Education” South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 19 (2)
Masters, G. (2016), ‘Five challenges in Australian school education’, Policy Insights, ( 5), Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER), research.acer.edu.au/policyinsights/5.
Murdoch, K & Hornsby, D (1997) Planning Curriculum Connections: Whole-School Planning for Integrated Curriculum Elanor Curtin: Armadale, Victoria
MCEETYA [Melbourne Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs] (2008), Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians, MCEETYA, Carlton South, Vic.
Nayler, J (1999) Inquiry Approaches to Secondary SOSE KLA http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/yrs1to10/kla/sose/docs/rp_sec00.doc Queensland School Curriculum Council: Brisbane accessed June 22, 2005
Pinar, William F (Summer, 1992) “Dreamt into existence by others: Curriculum Theory and Reform” Theory into Practice 31 (3)
Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority (QCAA), (2015) Year 7 -10 History Australian Curriculum in Queensland, Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority: Brisbane
Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority (QCAA), (2019) Senior Ancient History Syllabus, Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority: Brisbane.
Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority (QCAA), (2019) Senior modern History Syllabus, Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority: Brisbane
Reis, Sally et al, (1992) Curriculum Compacting Hawker Brownlow: Melbourne
Romanish, Bruce (1991) Empowering Teachers: Restructuring Schools for the Twentieth Century University Press of America: Lantham
Ross, E Wayne, Cornett, Jeffery W & McCutcheon, Gail (1992) Teacher Personal Theorising: Connecting Curriculum Practice, Theory and Research SUNY: New York
Seaton, Andrew (2001) “New Wine Demands New Bottles” EQ Australia Spring
Smith, Robert (1993) “Potentials for Empowerment in critical Education Research” Australian Educational Researcher 20 (2)
Smyth, John (Summer 1992) “Teachers’ Work and the Politics of Reflection” American Educational Research Journal 29 (2)
Stenhouse, Lawrence (1975) An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development Heinemann: London
Tomlinson, Carol Ann (1999) The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners ASCD: Virginia
Tomlinson, Carol Ann (1992) “Gifted Education and the Middle School Movement: Two voices on teaching the Academically Talented” Journal for the Education of the Gifted 15 (3) pp 206-238
Van Tassel-Basks, Joyce (1992) “Developing Learner Outcomes for Gifted Students” ERIC Digest #E514 Council for Exceptional Children: Reston, Va.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Waring, Felicity & Pat Kiddey (2001) Success For All Curriculum Corporation: Carlton
Wertsch, J. V. (1991) Voices of the mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
“What Makes Teens Tick?” (2004) Time May 10